It shall take effect from its publication.
Sole Transitory Provision.-Within a period of one year from the publication of this Regulation, the Technical Review Committee must consider other additional parameters to incorporate into the Physical-Chemical Classification Index for Superficial Water Bodies, considering the most representative parameters from Table 1, in order to achieve an Index that allows evaluations with more realistic results regarding the water quality of the resource.
APPENDIX I METHODOLOGY OF THE DUTCH SYSTEM FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL QUALITY OF WATER The Dutch Classification System for Water Quality allows transferring concentration information of the most important variables in the assessment of organic contamination in a water current, such as Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Ammoniacal Nitrogen, and Dissolved Oxygen converted to Percentage of Oxygen Saturation by means of the Real In Situ Oxygen and the theoretical value given by the temperature and atmospheric pressure at the study site, to a color code assigned to each class.
This classification model, from a spatial point of view, will allow placing a particular stretch of the river in a specific and temporally dependent classification, since the classification obtained in the rainy season will not correspond to that observed during the dry season. The competent agency must in turn define the period in which classifications must be carried out, as well as guarantee the permanence in the channel of an ecological flow (caudal ecológico).
To classify a superficial water, it is necessary to add the corresponding points in each of the respective areas for each of the variables according to the following table.
Table 3. Score assignment table according to the Dutch System for Assessment of the Physical-Chemical Quality of Water for receiving bodies.
| POINTS | PSO (%) | BOD (mg/L) | N-NH+4 (mg/L)* |
|---|
| 1 | 91-100 | <= 3 | < 0.50 |
| 2 | 71 - 90 | | |
| 111-120 | 3.1 - 6.0 | 0.50 - 1.0 |
| 3 | 51 - 70 | | |
| 121 - 130 | 6.1 - 9.0 | 1.1 - 2.0 |
| 4 | 31 - 50 | 9.1 - 15 | 2.1 - 5.0 |
| 5 | <= 30 and > 130 | > 15 | > 5.0 |
*Ammoniacal nitrogen PSO: Percentage of Dissolved Oxygen Saturation, D.O. It is obtained from the relationship between the actual D.O. obtained at the measurement site and the theoretical D.O. corresponding to the condition of clean water at the atmospheric pressure and temperature at the same measurement site.
BOD5: Biochemical Oxygen Demand, obtained under standard conditions of 20ºC and incubation for 5 days.
The sum of points obtained is then transferred to a color code with which the water quality of the receiving body is classified according to its own degree of contamination, following the next table. Finally, for each class from 1 to 5 and its corresponding color assignment, the quality status is defined from uncontaminated to totally contaminated.
Table 4. Table for assigning water quality classes according to the Dutch color-coding System, based on values of PSO, BOD, and ammoniacal nitrogen.
| Class | Sum of points | Color Code | Quality Interpretation |
|---|
| 1 | 3 | Blue | No contamination |
| 2 | 4-6 | Green | Incipient contamination |
| 3 | 7-9 | Yellow | Moderate contamination |
| 4 | 10-12 | Orange | Severe contamination |
| 5 | 13-15 | Red | Very severe contamination |
APPENDIX II ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATES METHODOLOGY 1. Placement and Exposure Time a) At each sampling station, a set of artificial substrates is placed consisting of four bricks, each inside a soft plastic mesh; the dimensions of the bricks are 0.1 m high, 0.2 m long, and 0.08 m wide, representing a total area of 0.088 m2 per brick.
- b)The artificial substrates will be placed on the channel or creek bed, tied to each other by means of a non-degradable rope and with a minimum distance of 10 m from one to another.
- c)This set of substrates remains in the water for a period of one month before its recovery.
2. Collection a) The mesh-brick set is recovered from the water quickly and safely, immediately placing it in a plastic container.
- b)The brick is extracted from the plastic mesh and cleaned gently with a soft-bristled brush.
- c)The mesh is cleaned by shaking it vigorously but carefully in the water contained in the container, until all organisms that were attached to the surface are deposited in the container.
- d)After washing the substrate, each of the resulting samples is passed through a 250 μm mesh filter, inside which it is washed to eliminate all fine particulate material.
- e)The material retained in the mesh after washing is transferred to a 500 ml plastic container and preserved with 96% ethanol (pure).
APPENDIX III BMWP-CR INDEX The BMWP-CR (Biological Monitoring Working Party modified for Costa Rica by Astorga, Martínez, Springer, and Flowers) is an index calculated by adding the scores assigned to the different taxa found in the macroinvertebrate samples and listed in Table 5. The score is assigned based on the degree of sensitivity to contamination.
| 9 | O Polythoridae D Blephariceridae; Athericidae E Heptageniidae P Perlidae T Lepidostomatidae; Odontoceridae; Hydrobiosidae; Ecnomidae | | --- | --- | | 8 | E Leptophlebiidae O Cordulegastridae; Corduliidae; Aeshnidae; Perilestidae T Limnephilidae; Calamoceratidae; Leptoceridae; B Glossosomatidae Blaberidae | | 7 | C Ptilodactylidae; Psephenidae; Lutrochidae O Gomphidae; Lestidae; Megapodagrionidae; T Protoneuridae; Platysticitidae Philopotamidae Cr Talitridae; Gammaridae | | 6 | O Libellulidae M Corydalidae T Hydroptilidae; Polycentropodidae; Xiphocentronidae E Euthyplociidae; Isonychidae | | 5 | L Pyralidae T Hydropsychidae; Helicopsychidae C Dryopidae; Hydraenidae; Elmidae; Limnichidae E Leptohyphidae; Oligoneuriidae; Polymitarcyidae; Cr Baetidae Tr Crustacea Turbellaria | | 4 | C Chrysomelidae; Curculionidae; Haliplidae; Lampyridae;Staphylinidae; D Dytiscidae; Gyrinidae; Scirtidae; Noteridae Dixidae; Simulidae; Tipulidae; Dolichopodidae; H Empididae; Muscidae; O Sciomyzidae; Ceratopogonidae; Stratiomyidae; E Tabanidae Hi Belostomatidae; Corixidae; Naucoridae; Pleidae; Nepidae; Notonectidae Calopterygidae; Coenagrionidae Caenidae Hidracarina | | 3 | C Hydrophilidae D Psychodidae Mo Valvatidae; Hydrobiidae; Lymnaeidae; Physidae; Planorbidae; Bithyniidae; A Bythinellidae; Sphaeridae Cr Hirudinea: Glossiphonidae; Hirudidae; Erpobdellidae Asellidae | | 2 | D Chironomidae; Culicidae; Ephydridae | | 1 | D Syrphidae A Oligochatea (all classes) | Note: D: Diptera; E: Ephemeroptera; P: Plecoptera; T: Trichoptera; O: Odonata; C: Coleoptera; M: Megaloptera; H: Hemiptera; L: Lepidoptera; B: Blattodea; Tr: Tricladida; Cr: Crustacea; A: Annelida; Mo: Molusco.
The classification of waters according to this index obtains values between 0 and an indeterminate maximum that, in practice, does not usually exceed 200.
Based on this score, 6 levels of Water Quality are established (the first two belong to the group of uncontaminated waters).
Table 6. Classification of Water Quality Based on the Total Score Obtained
| QUALITY LEVEL | BMWP' | Representative Color |
|---|
| Excellent quality waters. | >120 | Blue |
| Good quality waters, not contaminated or not sensibly altered. | 101-120 | Blue |
| Fair quality waters, eutrophic, moderate contamination. | 61-100 | Green |
| Poor quality waters, contaminated. | 36-60 | Yellow |
| Poor quality waters, very contaminated. | 16-35 | Orange |
| Very poor quality waters, extremely contaminated. | <15 | Red |
APPENDIX IV FIELD SAMPLING PROTOCOL 1. Location:
2. Municipality:
3. Name of the water body:
4. Sampling site:
5. Cartographic Sheet:
6. Function (use) of the watercourse/sampling site:
7. Sampling supervisor:
8. Date:
9. Time:
10. Typology of the watercourse A. Type: initial-middle-low-mouth course.
B. River/stream (lowland, mountain), canal, ponds, lagoon, lake, others________.
C. Width: ______m. Depth: ______m. Slope: ________.
D. Water velocity: fast, moderate, slow, stagnant (_______ m/s).
E. Water level as a function of: tide, precipitation, pumping station, flooding____________.
F. Bank structure: natural, stony, gabion, riprap, concrete_______________.
G. Substrate type: concrete (__%), stones-coarse sand (__%), sand (__%), clay-silt (__%), silty (__%).
H. Substrate condition: clean, covered with organic material, silt or sediment deposit.
I. Presence of organic matter: Yes_______ No_______
- a)Description of the type of organic matter: Leaf litter packs, fine particulate.
J. Engineering works: channelized, regulated, material extraction____________.
Vegetation K. Exposure: open, semi-open, covered (______% illuminated surface).
L. Riparian vegetation:_______________________________________.
M. Vegetation on the bank:_________________________________.
11. Surrounding environment: agricultural, industrial, residential, others.
Contamination status.
A. Visual characterization: none, medium, moderate, contaminated, very contaminated.
B. Presence of: organic waste, foams, oils, dead organisms, solid waste.
C. Sources of contamination: domestic, industrial, agricultural, others.
D. Presence of fish: ___________________________________.
E. Personal observation: _________________________________.
F. Reference: _________________________________________.
G. Water color:______________ Odor: ____________________ H. Transparency: clear, turbid, very turbid, not transparent (__________ cm. Secchi).
12. Sampling.
A. Sampling technique:
I. Hand net
II. Artificial Substrate
12.A.II.1. Number of samples:______ Exposure time:________.
12.A.II.2. Installation date:_________Collection date:_______.
III. Dredge
12.A.III.1. Number of samples:______________________.
B. Environmental conditions:
I. Before sampling:_______________________________
II. During sampling: ______________________________
C. Other comments: ___________________________________.
13. Figure of the sampling site: (Make a sketch of the sampling site) Given at the Presidency of the Republic, on the ninth day of March, two thousand seven.